Email - Jan.4, 2007
Hi Gary and Christine,
I listened to
Jamie tried to get him to answer one of the questions Gary McHale has been trying to get him to answer to no avail. The question was why the OPP allows Mohawk flags on poles on the east side of
The Commissioner will not answer those questions for the following reasons:
The OPP has information that the natives will become violent and aggressive if anyone tries to take down the Mohawk flags.
The OPP did not intervene in the raising of Mohawk flags on the hydro poles on the east side of
The OPP also know that if a Canadian flag is allowed to be raised on the poles across from DCE the natives will again become violent.
Which raises the question “What will the OPP do if the natives decide to steal meat from Zhers or anything else in
I was listening to news reports all day long on CHML and they repeatedly referred to the new OPP funding for the Haldimand Detachment. This is not correct. There are actually two detachments in Haldimand. There is the Cayuga Detachment and the Caledonia Detachment. Haldimand has two detachments if you look at the OPP site. The Cayuga detachment provides policing to all parts of Haldimand except
The training in the OPP police academy includes indoctrination into native ways so that OPP officers that will be assigned to
The bottom line is that this increase in budget isn’t to improve policing for the people and businesses of
Citizens of Caledonia need to become more familiar with the OPP contract with
This is a cost that was incurred by the government to maintain an illegal occupation (yes illegal). The biggest cover-up by the OPP and government is the fact that DCE was criminally removed from the possession of Henco Industries through Extortion committed by the natives, allowed by the OPP and government and never investigated. Henco was no willing seller. They were forced through Extortion to sell their land to the province.
Criminal Code
PART IX: OFFENCES AGAINST RIGHTS OF PROPERTY
Robbery and Extortion
|
346. (1) Every one commits extortion who, without reasonable justification or excuse and with intent to obtain anything, by threats, accusations, menaces or violence induces or attempts to induce any person, whether or not he is the person threatened, accused or menaced or to whom violence is shown, to do anything or cause anything to be done. |
|
|
Extortion |
(1.1) Every person who commits extortion is guilty of an indictable offence and liable (a) where a firearm is used in the commission of the offence, to imprisonment for life and to a minimum punishment of imprisonment for a term of four years; and (b) in any other case, to imprisonment for life. |
|
Saving |
(2) A threat to institute civil proceedings is not a threat for the purposes of this section. R.S., 1985, c. C-46, s. 346; R.S., 1985, c. 27 (1st Supp.), s. 46; 1995, c. 39, s. 150. |
Extortion is the primary crime that has been committed in
The OPP are on thin ice in
Regards,